"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
06/16/2015 at 10:03 • Filed to: None
1
5|
"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
06/16/2015 at 10:03 • Filed to: None | 1
| 5 |
Hey, neat! Wait a minute...
Oh god, it’s a convertible! It’s heavier and less rigid and slower around the nurburgring and the owner actually paid more for it and oh the humanity and it’s so awful God my eyes arrrrrrrgh!
/s
SaveTheIntegras
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
06/16/2015 at 10:07 |
|
do people actually buy Bently’s cause they want to go fast...?
newsmctado
> SaveTheIntegras
06/16/2015 at 10:10 |
|
Isn’t the old adage: Rolls Royces are cars for people with drivers. Bentleys are drivers’ cars.
|
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> SaveTheIntegras
06/16/2015 at 10:11 |
|
No. The buy Bentleys because they want to know they can.
64Mali
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
06/16/2015 at 10:17 |
|
Who cares about the Ring times. That is straight line gangsta cruising with the top down. Pull up and the honeys jump in.
(Pardon the excessive sarcasm)
|
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> 64Mali
06/16/2015 at 10:20 |
|
That’s okay, I was being excessively sarcastic as well.